Date of Award

5-2024

Document Type

Thesis

Department

Political Science

First Advisor

Patrick Donnay

Abstract

The rise of juvenile diversion programs in Minnesota has sparked widespread discussion, especially as the nation addresses its concerns about overcrowded jails and prisons stemming from past "tough-on-crime" policies. Minnesota has responded by creating alternative pathways for juvenile offenders, aiming to keep them out of the traditional justice system while still holding them responsible for their actions. However, research and existing literature are unclear as to which of these diversion programs help reduce juvenile arrest rates. Different factors in each case could provide insight into which programs are most effective. I seek to explain why certain Minnesota counties have been more successful in lowering their arrest rates between 2012 and 2018 through a series of bivariate and multivariate analyses. I used Unified Crime Report Data and data on county policies from United States Census Bureau American Community Survey which examines various diversion programs in Minnesota counties. Tentative results show that the more personalized the diversion program is, the more successful the county is in reducing juvenile recidivism. For juvenile diversion programs to be successful, they have to be personalized and have higher contact with the juvenile offender.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.