Date of Award
2019
Document Type
Thesis
Department
Political Science
Abstract
Technology has evolved and raided our personal and professional lives. Although the courts are not immune to the advancement and integration of technology, the courts are not keeping up with relevant technological advancements. Historically, courts have been hesitant to embrace new technologies despite the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure creates the right to a “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.” Likewise, the American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct have determined attorneys must “keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology . . .” to maintain competence. The bench and bar have a responsibility to keep up with the advancement of technology because technology affects the administration of justice. With the practice of criminal law being far behind in technological advancements and new technology entering the legal field now, criminal lawyers, judges, and other legal community members need to start incorporating this technology and be comfortable using it in their everyday lives.
Recommended Citation
Bergquist, Chantell, "Virtual Hearings and Blockchain Technology Solutions in Criminal Law" (2019). Political Science Theses and Capstones. 46.
https://pines.bemidjistate.edu/capstone-polisci/46
Included in
Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Cybersecurity Commons, Evidence Commons, Information Security Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Litigation Commons, Other Communication Commons, Other Computer Sciences Commons, Other Law Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons
