Author

Evan Tompkins

Date of Award

4-2017

Document Type

Thesis

Department

Political Science

First Advisor

Dr. Patrick Donnay

Abstract

Although normative questions about the role of the Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution have been commonly debated in political science research, an updated empirical question on Mishler and Sheehan’s (1993), study on public opinion and its impact on the Court must be asked. It has been 25 years since the publication of their study and numerous high profile cases such as Bush v. Gore, Citizens United v. FEC, and Obergefell v. Hodges have brought nationwide attention to the Supreme Court and how it interacts with public opinion. Results from empirical measurements of the Supreme Court’s decisions and what impact public opinion has, indicates no existence of a significant relationship. The Supreme Court's ideological composition changes in response to the ideological orientation of the president rather than a shift in public opinion. Mishler and Sheehan described the Court’s ideological balance since 1981 as being upset and undermined because of an unbroken string of conservative-to-moderate appointments. In the 25 years since the study, the countermajoritarian trend they noted at the beginning of the early 90’s seems to be continuing.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.