Date of Award
5-2015
Document Type
Thesis
Department
Political Science
First Advisor
Patrick Donnay
Abstract
The Obama Administration has come under scrutiny by both the public and Congress, since former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden made known the scope of government surveillance programs being utilized by the U.S. government to gather intelligence on domestic citizens. Snowden’s disclosures about the government’s surveillance practices to the mainstream media began in June 2013. I focus on how public opinion towards the government’s surveillance practices and an individual’s reasonable right to privacy has shifted after revelations made by Edward Snowden on the practices of the NSA. Individuals may show support for more government surveillance in the name of National Security when driven by fear of an imminent terror threat. Alternatively they may be anxious of greater government surveillance infringing on their privacy. Through analysis of Pew Research Center data on public opinion, I explore whether there has been a Snowden effect on public opinion shifting attitudes toward a greater appreciation of privacy. I anticipate attitudes on privacy and surveillance will shift in varying degrees across demographic, regional groups, and political identity. I also expect varying degrees of support amongst those who differ in their trust and attitudes towards the government.
Recommended Citation
Blake, Matthew C., "The Snowden Effect: The Conflict in a Free Society, Who Values Privacy Versus Who Values Security?" (2015). Political Science Theses and Capstones. 97.
https://pines.bemidjistate.edu/capstone-polisci/97
Included in
American Politics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, First Amendment Commons, Fourth Amendment Commons, Law and Society Commons, National Security Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Interest Commons, Public Policy Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Terrorism Studies Commons
