Author

Adam Smieja

Date of Award

5-2012

Document Type

Thesis

Department

Mathematics

First Advisor

Glen Richgels

Second Advisor

Derek Webb

Third Advisor

Todd Frauenholtz

Abstract

This paper reviewed related research on student achievement based on how students were grouped, homogeneously or heterogeneously. Questions examined were whether students performed better in heterogeneous or homogenous groupings and to what extent did high-, average-, and low-ability students perform better in a particular group. Results showed that high-ability students in homogeneous groupings had higher gains in achievement when compared to their counterparts in heterogeneous groupings. However, gains for these high-ability students were not statistically significant. On the contrary, average-, and low-ability students did show statistically significant gains in achievement in the heterogeneous groupings. Yet, despite their effectiveness, implementation of heterogeneous groupings was shown to be difficult. When successful heterogeneous groupings were implemented, they provided a high quality of instruction for all students and incorporated cooperative learning, differentiated instruction, flexible groupings, curriculum modification, and support for educators and students involved.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.