Date of Award

12-2012

Document Type

Thesis

Department

Mathematics

First Advisor

Glen Richgels

Second Advisor

Derek Webb

Third Advisor

Randy Westhoff

Abstract

This paper evaluates current research on the effect of grouping students of comparable abilities, a process known as tracking, in a secondary mathematics classroom. The research explores questions regarding the advantages and the disadvantages of tracking students by ability; the manner in which tracking affects the achievement of students in homogeneous and heterogeneous settings, and the ways tracking affects the achievement gap. In addition, this paper answers the question of how tracking affects students’ self- concept and self-esteem. Lastly, it examines changes in teacher attitude with respect to each track level and the impact of ability grouping on classroom structure and the curriculum being taught. The results show that tracking has a negative effect on achievement for lower ability students and has produced no significant achievement advantage for higher ability students. Consequently, tracking has effectively increased the achievement gap. In addition, the research has demonstrated that students in the lower track have lower self-esteem but no demonstrable change in self-concept. Lastly, the research shows that teachers of the lower tracked students had lower expectations for their students and had a disparaging attitude towards the lower track.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.